Last updated: June 29, 2026 · 12 min read
I get asked this a lot from first-time aluminum buyers: "Should I order 6061 or 6063?"
It's the right question. These two alloys look similar on paper, and a lot of suppliers will sell you either one without asking what you actually need it for. But they're not interchangeable. Pick the wrong one and you end up paying for strength you don't use, or worse — getting parts that fail because you chose the weaker alloy.
Here's the short version: 6061 is stronger, 6063 looks better. Which one you need depends on what you're building.
| Property | 6061-T6 | 6063-T5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile Strength | 310 MPa | 290 MPa | 6061 (7% higher) |
| Yield Strength | 276 MPa | 145 MPa | 6061 (90% higher) |
| Elongation | 12-17% | 8-12% | 6061 |
| Brinell Hardness | 95 HB | 60 HB | 6061 |
| Modulus of Elasticity | 68.9 GPa | 68.9 GPa | Tie |
| Corrosion Resistance | Good | Excellent | 6063 |
| Weldability | Excellent | Good | 6061 |
| Machinability | Good (rating: 70%) | Fair (rating: 50%) | 6061 |
| Extrudability | Good | Excellent | 6063 |
| Anodizing Quality | Fair (streak-prone) | Excellent (uniform) | 6063 |
| Formability | Good | Excellent | 6063 |
| Typical Cost Premium | +5-15% (vs 6063) | Baseline | 6063 (cheaper) |
Data sources: ASM Materials Data Sheet, MatWeb alloy database, ASTM B209/B221/B241 standards.
Both alloys are in the 6xxx series (Al-Mg-Si). The difference is in the percentages.
| Element | 6061 (% max) | 6063 (% max) | What It Affects |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silicon (Si) | 0.40-0.80 | 0.20-0.60 | Strength + extrudability |
| Magnesium (Mg) | 0.80-1.20 | 0.45-0.90 | Strength + corrosion resistance |
| Copper (Cu) | 0.15-0.40 | 0.10 max | Strength (but hurts corrosion) |
| Iron (Fe) | 0.70 max | 0.35 max | Anodizing color consistency |
| Chromium (Cr) | 0.04-0.35 | 0.10 max | Grain structure control |
| Titanium (Ti) | 0.15 max | 0.10 max | Grain refinement |
| Others (each) | 0.05 max | 0.05 max | — |
Here's what matters in practice: 6061 has more copper and iron. Copper gives it higher strength. But copper also reduces corrosion resistance, and iron makes the anodized finish less consistent. That's why 6063 anodizes so much better — less junk in the alloy to mess with the color.
6063 has higher magnesium-to-silicon ratio, which means it extrudes faster and with a smoother surface. That's not a small thing on a production line — faster extrusion means lower cost per meter.
If you're putting an aluminum part under load, yield strength is the number to watch, not tensile. Here's why:
Tensile strength tells you when the material breaks. Yield strength tells you when it starts to bend permanently. For structural parts, you care about the latter.
6061-T6's yield strength (276 MPa) is nearly double 6063-T5's (145 MPa). That's a massive gap. If your part carries weight — a truck frame, a solar panel mounting rail, a machine base — 6061 is the only real choice.
For applications where loads are light (window frames, handrails, furniture), 6063's lower yield is fine. You'd be over-engineering with 6061, and paying for it.
One number I see people miss: modulus of elasticity is identical for both alloys (68.9 GPa). Stiffness is the same. 6061 doesn't flex less — it just takes more load before it stays bent.
6063 was developed specifically for extrusion. It's why most architectural aluminum — window frames, curtain wall sections, handrails — is 6063.
What does better extrudability actually look like on the factory floor?
For simple shapes (round tube, flat bar, angle), the difference isn't dramatic. But for complex hollow sections with thin walls, 6063 makes a real difference in consistency across a production run.
This one trips people up. Both alloys can be anodized. But the result is noticeably different.
6063 produces a clean, uniform anodized layer. Color anodizing (bronze, black, gold) comes out consistent across the surface and from batch to batch. That's because 6063 has lower iron content — iron creates streaks and variations in the anodic coating.
6061, especially in plate form, tends to show grain structure through the anodized finish. You get a mottled or streaky appearance, particularly on larger surfaces. For a machine part that nobody looks at twice, that's fine. For a building facade or a railing, it's a problem.
If the part needs to look good after anodizing, spec 6063.
Both alloys weld fine with standard methods (TIG, MIG, resistance welding). But there's a difference in how they behave near the weld joint.
6061 holds up better in the heat-affected zone — it keeps more of its original strength after welding. Post-weld heat treatment can bring it close to full T6 properties. 6063, honestly, loses more strength at the weld. The HAZ softening is more of an issue if the part is structural.
For machining, 6061 wins hands down. It produces short, clean chips and cuts smoothly. 6063 is gummier — tends to grab tools and throw long, stringy chips. If you're doing a lot of post-extrusion machining, 6061 will save you a headache.
| Product Form | 6061-T6 (FOB China) | 6063-T5 (FOB China) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plate/Sheet (4'×8', 3mm) | $2,800-3,200/ton | $2,500-2,800/ton | 6061 ~12% higher |
| Round Tube (50mm OD, 3mm WT) | $3,200-3,600/ton | $2,800-3,200/ton | 6061 ~10% higher |
| Square Tube (40×40mm, 2mm WT) | $3,000-3,500/ton | $2,700-3,100/ton | 6061 ~10% higher |
| Extruded Profiles (custom) | $3,500-4,200/ton | $3,200-3,800/ton | 6061 ~8% higher |
| Bar/Rod (various sizes) | $2,600-3,000/ton | $2,400-2,700/ton | 6061 ~8% higher |
Prices are estimates based on mid-2026 market data. Actual FOB pricing varies by quantity, surface finish, and delivery terms. Contact us for current quotes.
6061 is generally 8-15% more expensive than 6063 in equivalent forms. The premium comes from the higher alloy content and tighter production controls needed. For large orders (20+ tons), the price difference narrows but doesn't disappear.
One thing worth noting: for custom extrusions, 6063 can actually be cheaper than 6061 despite its lower base price, because it runs faster on the press and wastes less material. Die costs are the same for both alloys.
| Application | Recommended Alloy | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Window & door frames | 6063-T5 | Excellent anodizing, complex extrusions, adequate strength |
| Curtain wall systems | 6063-T5/T6 | Surface finish quality, consistent color, corrosion resistance |
| Solar panel mounting frames | 6063-T6 | Good strength, corrosion resistance, cost-effective |
| Truck & trailer frames | 6061-T6 | High yield strength for structural loads |
| Marine components | 6061-T6 | Better strength, good enough corrosion resistance |
| Handrails & balustrades | 6063-T5 | Good appearance, easy to form, adequate strength |
| Furniture (indoor) | 6063-T5 | Surface finish, formability, cost |
| Furniture (outdoor) | 6061-T6 or 6063-T6 | Better corrosion and UV resistance |
| Automotive parts | 6061-T6 | Higher strength for structural and safety parts |
| Architectural railings | 6063-T5 | Consistent anodized color, smooth surface |
| Machine bases & frames | 6061-T6 | High strength, good machinability |
| Heat sinks | 6063-T5 | Excellent thermal conductivity, complex fin shapes |
| Electrical bus bars | 6061 or 6063 | Either works — conductivity is similar |
| Pipe & tube (structural) | 6061-T6 | Higher load capacity, better weld strength |
| Pipe & tube (decorative) | 6063-T5 | Better surface, cheaper, easier to bend |
If you're importing to your country, make sure the standard matches what your local regulations expect.
| Standard | 6061 | 6063 | Product Form |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASTM B209 | ✔ Alloy 6061 | ✔ Alloy 6063 | Sheet & plate |
| ASTM B221 | ✔ Alloy 6061 | ✔ Alloy 6063 | Extruded bar, rod, shapes |
| ASTM B241 | ✔ Alloy 6061 | ✔ Alloy 6063 | Seamless pipe & tube |
| EN 485 (Europe) | ✔ EN AW-6061 | ✔ EN AW-6063 | Sheet & plate |
| EN 755 (Europe) | ✔ EN AW-6061 | ✔ EN AW-6063 | Extrusions |
| JIS H4000 (Japan) | ✔ A6061P | ✔ A6063P | Sheet & plate |
| JIS H4080 (Japan) | ✔ A6061TD | ✔ A6063TD | Seamless tube |
| GB/T 3190 (China) | ✔ 6061 | ✔ 6063 | Chemical composition |
| GB/T 3880 (China) | ✔ 6061 | ✔ 6063 | Sheet & plate |
| ISO 6362 | ✔ AlMg1SiCu | ✔ AlMg0.7Si | Wrought products |
Still not sure? Here's a simple process:
Most of the time, the answer becomes clear after the third question. When it doesn't, go with 6061 — you can always over-spec strength, but you can't easily fix a part that's too weak.
A few things I see regularly from first-time buyers:
1. Ordering 6061 when they need 6063 for anodizing. I've seen this on curtain wall projects where the architect spec'd clear anodized finish. 6061-T6 plate came out with visible streaks. Had to reorder in 6063. Costly mistake.
2. Ordering 6063-T5 for structural brackets. The yield strength difference catches people. 145 MPa vs 276 MPa — that's not a small gap. If your bracket sees vibration or repeated loading, 6063 may not hold up.
3. Assuming T6 temper makes both alloys equal. 6063-T6 still only reaches about 214 MPa yield strength. That's better than 6063-T5's 145 MPa, but still well below 6061-T6's 276 MPa. Temper matters, but the base alloy still sets the upper limit.
4. Paying for 6061 on non-structural decorative parts. If you're making indoor handrails that will see light use, 6063-T5 is fine. Don't pay the 10-15% premium for strength you won't use.
We stock both alloys — sheet, plate, round tube, square tube, rectangular tube, and custom extrusions. Every shipment comes with mill test certificates. Third-party inspection (SGS, BV) is available if you need it.
Send us your specs: dimensions, temper, quantity, and what you're building. We'll recommend the right alloy and get you an FOB quote within 24 hours. No pressure.
Also see our 5052 vs 6061 vs 7075 Selection Guide and Aluminum Temper Designations Guide for more detailed comparisons.